Architecture Assessment

Answer four focused questions to identify the system pressure that matters most and a proportionate technical direction to investigate.

Question 1 of 4System

What part of the software landscape are you evaluating?

Choose the area where the most important operational problem currently lives.

Choose one answer

Select the closest match

System integrationConnected systems fall out of sync, exchange unreliable data, or depend on brittle API contracts.Workflow automationA multi-stage process needs clearer rules, reliable handoffs, or deliberate human review.Custom business softwareStandard tools or spreadsheets no longer fit the records, roles, and rules of the operation.Customer or partner portalCustomers or partners need secure self-service, document exchange, or role-specific workflows.AI integrationExisting software needs a controlled extraction, classification, or summarization capability.

Why it matters: This establishes the system boundary before any implementation approach is considered.

Before you use the result

What this assessment can—and cannot—tell you.

The result is useful when its boundaries are clear. These answers explain how to interpret it and what a technical review would still need to verify.

Architecture Assessment

What part of the software landscape are you evaluating?

How does Conflect use this architecture assessment?

Is the result binding or prescriptive?

What happens during a technical architecture conversation?

Can Conflect evaluate an existing codebase or infrastructure?

Who owns the code and delivery materials?